SnapRays, DBA SnapPower v. Lightning Defense Group
The use of Amazon’s notice and takedown procedure (APEX) can subject a patent owner to specific personal jurisdiction in an accused infringer’s home state.
Results for personal jurisdiction
view Case Detail
Download PDF
TC Heartland, LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands, LLC
28 U.S.C. § 1391(c) still supplements 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) regarding venue in patent infringement cases despite Congress’ 2011 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
In re: TC Heartland LLC
28 U.S.C. § 1391(c) still supplements 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) regarding venue in patent infringement cases despite Congress’ 2011 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
NeoMedia Technologies Inc. v. AirClic Inc.
Defendant Delaware corporations are not subject to personal jurisdiction in Illinois patent infringement suit, even though defendants maintain “hybrid” websites that allow exchange of information between users and the companies, because the websites do not reach the level of interactivity required to establish personal jurisdiction.