Results for obviousness

LG Electronics Inc. v. ImmerVision, Inc.

Case Number: CLB0506

Date: 07.11.2022

A reference that contains an obvious typographical error that would have been apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art such that the person would disregard or correct the error does not disclose the subject matter contained in that error.

view Case Detail Download PDF

FOX Factory, Inc. v. SRAM, LLC

Case Number: CLB0465

Date: 12.18.2019

In determining the presumption of nexus for secondary considerations, a patent claim is not coextensive with a product that includes a “critical” unclaimed feature that materially impacts the product’s functionality.

view Case Detail Download PDF

Uber Technologies, Inc. v. X One, Inc.

Case Number: CLB0457

Date: 05.05.2020

If the prior art teaches two predictable choices and a person of ordinary skill in the art has good reason to pursue the known options within his or her technical grasp, then § 103 will bar the patentability of an obvious variation.

view Case Detail Download PDF

ZUP, LLC v. Nash Mfg., Inc.

Case Number: CLB0423

Date: 07.25.2018

A weak showing of both long-felt but unresolved need and copying cannot overcome a strong showing of obviousness set forth by predictable use of prior art elements according to established functions.

view Case Detail Download PDF