Results for 35 U.S.C. § 101

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.

Case Number: CLB0438

Date: 06.25.2019

The specification does not need to expressly list why the claimed invention is unconventional if the claims recite what is inventive, Berkheimer applies to motions under Rule 12(b)(6) in addition to applying at the summary judgment stage, and the presumption of patent validity includes a presumption of patent-eligibility.

view Case Detail Download PDF

Visual Memory LLC v. NVIDIA Corp.

Case Number: CLB0395

Date: 08.15.2017

Claims may be directed to a technological improvement over the prior art and deemed patent-eligible subject matter even if the claims do not recite complete technical details, so long as the technological improvement is sufficiently described within the written description.

view Case Detail Download PDF