Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp.

Case Number: CLB0167

Date: 10.18.2007

Citation: 85 U.S.P.Q.2d 1001 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

In lieu of an injunction, a district court may impose an “ongoing royalty” that requires future royalty payments from an infringer to a patentee, but allows the infringer to continue its infringing operations.

Download PDF

Tagged In:

compulsory license damages doctrine of equivalents equitable relief expert testimony injunction ongoing royalty Seventh Amendment

Return to Case Law Briefs Main Page