Ex parte Tanaka

Case Number: CLB0239

Date: 12.09.2009

Citation: 93 U.S.P.Q.2d 1291 (B.P.A.I. 2009) (precedential)

The B.P.A.I. finds that the presentation of narrower dependent claims in a reissue application that contains the original claims as a hedge against possible invalidity is not an error correctible by 35 U.S.C. § 251.

Download PDF

Tagged In:

35 U.S.C. § 251 correctible errors hedge against invalidity reissue patents
Return to Case Law Briefs Main Page