Ex parte Tanaka
The B.P.A.I. finds that the presentation of narrower dependent claims in a reissue application that contains the original claims as a hedge against possible invalidity is not an error correctible by 35 U.S.C. § 251.
The B.P.A.I. finds that the presentation of narrower dependent claims in a reissue application that contains the original claims as a hedge against possible invalidity is not an error correctible by 35 U.S.C. § 251.